Monday, November 14, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
About Me
Feeds
Twitter Updates
Labels
- language (99)
- prescriptivism (39)
- politics (38)
- navel gazing (36)
- comic (32)
- Rock n' Roll (27)
- swedish (27)
- atheism (22)
- offensive (19)
- grammar (18)
- WTF (13)
- art (13)
- dialects (12)
- English only (11)
- Green choices (11)
- applied math (11)
- thing that piss me off (10)
- economics (9)
- sticking it to the man (9)
- civic involvement (6)
- energy (6)
- advertising (5)
- linguistics (5)
- mistakes (5)
- offspring (5)
- pseudoscience (5)
- science journalism (5)
- Phillies (4)
- sketch (4)
- family (3)
- healthcare (3)
- sports (3)
- war on terror (3)
- Lingies (2)
- Technology (2)
- books (2)
- food (2)
- literacy (2)
- movies (2)
- self promotion (2)
- volunteer (2)
- Ebba Grön (1)
- Home Renovation (1)
- Homeland Security (1)
- Joan Jett (1)
- eggcorns (1)
- email (1)
- linguists (1)
- literature (1)
- postmodern punctuation (1)
- sentences (1)
- verb morphology (1)
Followers
Change Congress
4 comments:
Wha? Is Scott Adams actually, really championing ID as a scientific theory?
He claims he is not. That his real beef is that there are no credible people on either side of the issue. To me that's an incredibly dumb argument. Almost as dumb as his cartoons (ad hominem).
Agreed, Liberal Elite. It's as dumb as a bag of hammers.
He seems like a Dilbert character himself. "All that's worth knowing I learned in a warren of cubicles, and now I'm going to apply it to evolution."
Post a Comment